The first step that takes a good chunk of your time is researching your speech. Whether you are conducting primary research or relying on secondary research sources, you’re going to be spending a significant amount of time researching. As Howard and Taggart point out in their book Research Matters, research is not just a one-and-done task.

Expected behaviorCPU consumption is very low, or zero, when no containers are running. Actual behaviorDocker for Mac is currently consuming 100% of CPU (1 full core) on a 4-core mid-2014 Retina MBP 15'. There are no containers running, and even old containers that were in stopped status have been removed.

InformationDiagnostic ID DF2FCECB-CD24-4209-BF81-04FCDC2D55D3. Steps to reproduce the behaviorNo clear steps available. Docker for Mac has been running for some time, always successfully, but a couple of hours ago started to show high CPU consumption. Teri ankhiyo ka war mp3 song download mp3. Tried restarting but the problem does not go away.

Interactive Advertising Bureau & Tech Lab116 East 27th Street, 7th FloorNew York, New York 100164 September 2018Dear colleague,Re: feedback on the beta OpenRTB 3.0 specificationThe IAB has requested input on the beta OpenRTB 3.0 specification. This response sets out an acute concern about the lack of data protection in this specification.The protection of personal data has been absent from previous OpenRTB specifications.

It is a matter of concern to Internet users, and is also now of utmost commercial concern to marketers. This commercial concern arises from two facts.First, as you will no doubt know, a recent ruling at the European Court of Justice, on 5 June (C‑210/16), indicates that marketersare directly exposed as “controllers” to legal risk from data protection infringements in data processing that they commission, or cause to be commissioned. The Court ruled that this applies even if the marketer never directly handles the personal data.Second, under Article 82 (4) of the General Data Protection Regulation, a marketer may be exposed to the “entire damage” created by ad tech vendors that process personal data in the OpenRTB system, which infringes the Regulation. In other words, marketers are now liable for the misuse of personal data in the RTB system.OpenRTB 3.0, and previous iterations of OpenRTB, causes an acute data protection problem. Every time a person loads a page on a website that uses OpenRTB 3.0 advertising, personal data about them are broadcast to tens – or hundreds -of companies in the OpenRTB bid request. These personal data include:. Your IP address.

What you are reading or watching. Your location. Description of your device, and ad tech companies’ unique IDs for you. (This will allow ad tech companies to try to reidentify you the next time you are seen, so that a long-term profile can be built or consolidated with offline data about you.).

Data broker segment ID, if available. (This could denote things like your income bracket, age and gender, habits, social media influence, ethnicity, sexual orientation, religion, political leaning, etc.)These data are very likely to include “special categories”of personal data, since they show what the person is watching and reading, and since the OpenRTB 3.0 specification enables the inclusion of data brokers’ segment IDs.A more complete summary of the personal data in bid requests is provided for your convenience in. Relevant excerpts from the OpenRTB AdCOM specification are provided in.The broadcast of these personal data under OpenRTB is referred to as an “RTB bid request”. As with previous iterations of OpenRTB, this will be generally broadcast widely, since the objective is to solicit bids from companies that might want to show an ad to the person who has just loaded the webpage. An RTB bid request is broadcast on behalf of websites by companies known as “supply side platforms” (SSPs) and by “ad exchanges”.Personal data are broadcast in bid requests to multiple Demand Side Partners (DSPs), which then decide whether to place bids for the opportunity to show an ad to the person in question. The DSP acts on behalf of a marketer, and decides when to bid based on the profile of person that the marketer has instructed it to target.

Sometimes, Data Management Platforms (DMPs), of which Cambridge Analytica is a notorious example, can perform a sync that contributes to their existing profiles of the person. It is worth noting that this sync would not be possible without the initial bid request.RTB as presented in the OpenRTB 3.0 specification is a data protection free zone.The overriding commercial incentive for many ad tech companies is to share as many data with as many partners as possible, and to share it with partner or parent companies that run data brokerages.

Clearly, releasing personal data into such an environment has high risk.Despite this high risk, the OpenRTB 3.0 specification establishes no control over what happens to these personal data once an SSP or ad exchange broadcasts a “bid request”. Even if bid request traffic is secure, there are no technical measures that prevent the recipient of a bid request from, for example, combining them with other data to create a profile, or from selling the data on. In other words, there is no data protection.I note that IAB Europe’s own documentation on how such a broadcast of personal data could conform with European data protection law reveals the industry view: A company “may choose not to pass bid requests containing personal data to other vendors who do not have consent”.In other words, once DSPs receive personal data they can freely trade these personal data with business partners however they wish. The distribution of a bid request creates this data protection-free zone.In fact, this is very likely to be a data breach.